<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>roiBert &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roibert.com/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roibert.com</link>
	<description>Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of ROI</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reqruented?</title>
		<link>http://www.roibert.com/2011/01/22/reqruented/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roibert.com/2011/01/22/reqruented/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 04:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roibert.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Searches are up for the term &#8220;reqruented&#8221; after reports that: &#8216;Todd Palin reqruented a massage therapist now busted for &#8220;prostitution&#8221;.&#8217; The sex scandal was first published by the ENQUIRER, a &#8216;tabloid&#8217; that broke the John Edwards affair. But this post is not really about the Palins or the scandalous accusations but about the term &#8216;reqruented&#8217; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Searches are up for the term &#8220;reqruented&#8221; after reports that:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8216;Todd Palin <strong>reqruented </strong>a massage therapist now busted for &#8220;prostitution&#8221;.&#8217;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The sex scandal was first published by the ENQUIRER, a &#8216;tabloid&#8217; that broke the John Edwards affair. But this post is not really about the Palins or the scandalous accusations but about the term &#8216;reqruented&#8217; and it&#8217;s use (or lack-there-of) in the English language.</p>
<p>As of this posting, a search on <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/reqruented">Dictionary.com</a> finds no results. Neither is the term found in the <a href="http://oxforddictionaries.com/noresults?dictionaryVersion=region-us&amp;isWritersAndEditors=true&amp;noresults=true&amp;page=1&amp;pageSize=20&amp;q=reqruented&amp;searchUri=All&amp;sort=alpha&amp;type=dictionarysearch">Oxford Dictionaries</a>.</p>
<p>Even on Google, when you do a search for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=reqruented&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a#q=reqruented+-palin&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;hs=nor&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;filter=0&amp;fp=8ce0e008a607e93d">&#8220;reqruented -palin&#8221;</a> a paltry 14 results are returned. As might be suspected, a good portion of the results are legal in nature indicating that it is more of a legal-term.</p>
<div id="attachment_77" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 402px"><a href="http://www.roibert.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/reqruented.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-77 " title="Google 'reqruented' search results" src="http://www.roibert.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/reqruented.jpg" alt="Google search results for 'reqruented'" width="392" height="55" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google search results for &#39;reqruented&#39;.</p></div>
<p>The domainer in me briefly toyed with the idea of registering reqruent.com (which, as of this posting, <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/reqruented.com">DomainTools</a> is showing as still available) but I decided not to. My main interest in the term is as a search marketer and the fascination by the search trends that can be generated by a breaking news story that includes such a rare and seldom used word.</p>
<p>That, and I wonder if my wife will let me get away with using &#8216;reqruent&#8217; in our next Scrabble game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roibert.com/2011/01/22/reqruented/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Adds Friends To Description</title>
		<link>http://www.roibert.com/2010/04/15/google-adds-friends-to-description/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roibert.com/2010/04/15/google-adds-friends-to-description/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roibert.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;You are known by the friends you keep&#8221; may be an old saying but it is finding new meaning in the world of search. Google is testing adding &#8220;Friends&#8221; in a gray text sub-headline when returning search results from Facebook. Every day, Google brings a little more of the social media world into the search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You are known by the friends you keep&#8221; may be an old saying but it is finding new meaning in the world of search. </p>
<p>Google is testing adding &#8220;Friends&#8221; in a gray text sub-headline when returning search results from Facebook.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.roibert.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/google-facebook.jpg"><img src="http://www.roibert.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/google-facebook.jpg" alt="" title="google-facebook"  class="alignnone size-full wp-image-68" /></a></p>
<p>Every day, Google brings a little more of the social media world into the search results. If you have been hesitant to embrace social media, you can not afford to wait any longer. Social can have a very positive impact on how (and IF) you are found in the search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roibert.com/2010/04/15/google-adds-friends-to-description/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Cutts on using WordPress and SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.roibert.com/2009/08/20/matt-cutts-on-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roibert.com/2009/08/20/matt-cutts-on-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roibert.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great video of Matt Cutts at Wordcamp 2009 giving a presentation on SEO and blogging with WordPress. Matt really does a great job in this presentation. The content is informative and Matt is engaging. And while the presentation was primarily for bloggers using WordPress, the insight that Matt provides in this video about the on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video of Matt Cutts at Wordcamp 2009 giving a presentation on SEO and blogging with WordPress.</p>
<p>Matt really does a great job in this presentation. The content is informative and Matt is engaging. And while the presentation was primarily for bloggers using WordPress, the insight that Matt provides in this video about the on page elements that Google looks at is beneficial to anyone running a website and looking to increase their ranking in the search results.</p>
<p>The video is 45 minutes long but well worth the time. So grab a cup of coffee, turn off twitter (after you tweet about this post <img src='http://www.roibert.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) and take the time out to enjoy a really great presentation.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="220" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://v.wordpress.com/lAZUouJF" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="220" src="http://v.wordpress.com/lAZUouJF" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Hat tip to the video and audio crew on this as well.  Great job all the way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roibert.com/2009/08/20/matt-cutts-on-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does a .org domain improve search engine ranking?</title>
		<link>http://www.roibert.com/2009/06/01/does-a-org-domain-improve-search-engine-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roibert.com/2009/06/01/does-a-org-domain-improve-search-engine-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roibert.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In SEO nothing is black and white except the hats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short answer is it depends&#8230; in SEO nothing is black and white except the hats. <img src='http://www.roibert.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In general, .ORG does NOT carry any more weight than .COM. To test this, do a search for a variety of search phrases. I would test about ten to get a good statistical data but less will give you a good idea as well.</p>
<p>Go ahead, we&#8217;ll wait&#8230;.</p>
<p>What percentage of the results are .COM? .NET? .ORG? .GOV?</p>
<p>Percentage wise, I am sure you will find that .COM did better. Naturally, there are more .COM domain names with active sites so it stands to reason that there would be a higher percentage of .COM in the results but even when you take that into account, you still get a larger percentage of .COM most of the time. So <em>in general</em>, the answer is no, .ORG does not carry more weight.</p>
<p>But wait a minute&#8230; did you notice that the percentages changed based on the search query? Now we are back to &#8220;depends&#8221; and here is why&#8230;</p>
<p>Certain terms do better with certain TLDs because the search engines do a pretty good job at weighting the likely hood of the end user finding relevant content on a given TLD based on the &#8220;theme&#8221; and/or segmentation of the search phrase.</p>
<p>For instance, a search for &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=housing">housing</a>&#8221; on Google pulls up mostly .GOV and .EDU TLDs because most searchers looking for &#8220;housing&#8221; are searching for housing assistance or student housing and .EDU and .GOV websites would provide the most relevant results.</p>
<p>So as stated above, in general, no a .ORG does not carry any more weight than .COM. But when you look at specific search terms, it very well could rank higher because the search engines might have those terms more closely associated to the type of content that would be found on a .ORG site.</p>
<p>So is .ORG the right decision for you? It depends on what the search phrases are that are relevant to your non-profit. Are those terms more associated with .ORG than they are .COM? (yes, run the test again using those terms.) If you find that those terms have a higher percentage of .ORGs in the search results, then you might find SOME benefit in the .ORG domain name. Again, nothing is black and white in SEO except the hats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roibert.com/2009/06/01/does-a-org-domain-improve-search-engine-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

